Being A Victim Of Domestic Violence - 1596 Words

Anyone of any social status, academic level, age, height, weight, you name it has the possibility of being a victim of domestic violence. However, there are certain risk factors that increases the likelihood of becoming a victim. In bad neighborhoods, they may feel socially ostracized if there is tension in the area and a lack of community. This can also be a consequence of victimization because the offender may separate himself and the victim from all contact from family, friends, etc. When the victim needs love and support, they will not know where to go. Isolation can be a precursor to abuse as well. For example, when the victim was younger and in a public school system, they may have been isolated and not had very many friends. This†¦show more content†¦This may also be a consequence because the victim may feel as if they could not have a healthy, â€Å"normal† relationship without the presence of promiscuity or delinquent behavior, such as doing drugs. The offender and future suitors may pressure the victim to do things that end up victimizing the individual again. Of course, having a history of prior sexual or any other type of physical and psychological abuse is a risk factor and a consequence. The victim will have grown up thinking that abuse is the only way to resolve conflict and will not be able to comprehend any other way of resolution to these problems. This can also lead to mental health problems which makes the victim even more vulnerable to future victimization. This is also a consequence in that once the victim comes out of a bad relationship, their view on conflict resolution will lead them back into another bad relationship. Traditional gender roles are also a risk factor for victimization. The victim views the man of the relationship as the power-holding and dominant partner of the relationship and the women is meant to cater to his every need. While this is a common view, how it becomes a risk factor is when this view is twisted and the victim sees abuse as the male proving his dominance over the woman. Again, this will be viewed as the norm, and this cycle will continue based on what

Global Value Chain Management - 1307 Words

Technology in Business  « Do you adapt or redesign your business model for the Internet?If you don’t want your unprofitable customers someone else will  » ECCO A/S – Global value chain management case study Wednesday, August 31st, 2011 at 8:27 am My operations management coursework was based on the ECCO A/S – Global Value Chain Management case study which is an interesting paper on ECCO A/S (ECCO) who have been very successful in the footwear industry by focusing on production technology and assuring quality by maintaining full control of the entire value chain from â€Å"cow to shoe.†. ECCO follow a differentiation business strategy producing the highest quality shoes and they use their operations as one of their main points of†¦show more content†¦If operations were outsourced, they would not be able to oversee all aspects of production and insure that quality was high. Vertical Value Chain Benefits Hosting your own in-house vertical value chain has many benefits for a business like ECCO. ECCO s many facilities in different countries can take advantage of local resources and expertise in different areas like the leather research center in Denmark. Another benefit is being able to oversee operations and produce products faster. Inventory can be controlled efficiently, meaning that ECCO can wait longer to produce items to match market mean due to how long it would take to place an order with an outsourced manufacturer and to receive that order to deliver to customers. Vertical Value Chain Cons The main negative for ECCO in having an integrated vertical value chain is increased costs over competitors. For most shoe companies, the cheapest option is to outsource manufacturing, which is what most of ECCO s competitors have done. Another con of keeping production within the company is that when no competition is present, often production is slow and inefficient. Managing the cons is vital for ECCO, which they have been able to do. Economic Strategic Factors Considered with Integrated Value Chain Economic factors that are faced with an integrated value chain include high labor costs. If producing your ownShow MoreRelatedThe Global Value Chain Management803 Words   |  3 PagesThe emergence of global value chains has been one of the most important paths to economic growth in the age of globalization. A global value chain typically focuses on building efficiencies for business on the inbound and outbound logistics component of the value chain, where the process of producing a good has been divided into multiple components. Any given good is the product of resource extractors, component subcontractors, assembly and logistics, in addition to the design and marketing functionsRead MoreEccos global value chain management1730 Words   |  7 PagesECCO A/S-GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS 1. Describe the competitive environment of ECCO and determine how well ECCO is positioned (vis-à  -vis the competitors) to take advantage of changes in the industry. http://wulibraries.typepad.com/files/footwear.pdf 2. Analyze ECCO’s global value chain. How well does this configuration match the drivers in the industry? Analyze ECCO’s global value chain. High demand for quality and reduced lead times led the company to a self-sufficiency approach onRead MoreEcco a/S – Global Value Chain Management1709 Words   |  7 PagesFirm in a Global Economy ECCO A/S – Global Value Chain Management Question 1: 1. Relate the Ecco case to the conceptualization of the organization as a global factory. What similarities and dissimilarities with the global factory conceptualization do you see and what solutions may it present? Similarities: As ECCO had been very successful in the footwear industry by focusing on production technology and assuring quality by maintaining full control of the entire value chain, ECCO grewRead MoreEcco a/S-Global Chain Value Management991 Words   |  4 PagesCase 4-2  : ECCO A/S – Global Value Chain Management. ECCO is a worldwide company acting on the market of the shoes manufacturing. It has been created for more than 40 years and is one of the leaders of the market. The company key point in his product is the quality with a combine production: manual and machinery, a production of their leather made in-house and a unique direct injection technology. With this different assets the firm aimed to become the producer of the world’s most comfortableRead MoreMarketing Analysis : Global Supply Chain Essay1721 Words   |  7 PagesGlobal supply chain remains a highly contested theme and there have been many attempts to define the real winner and competition of market power in the literature. The participant network varies in size and scope, depending on the products involved, geographic dispersion of supply and demand, and customer service requirements. Martin Christopher (2011: 15) states that within global supply chains the real competition is not company against company but rather, s upply chains against supply chains. ThisRead MoreLi Fung – the Global Value Chain Configurator1569 Words   |  7 Pagesphilosophy behind supply-chain management and the specific practices that Li Fung has developed to reduce costs and lead times, allowing its customers to buy closer to the market. Li Fung, Hong Kong s largest export trading company, has been an innovator in global supply-chain management. Li Fung has also been a pioneer in dispersed manufacturing. It performs the higher-value-added tasks such as design and quality control in Hong Kong, and outsources the lower-value-added tasks to the bestRead MoreGlobal Value Chain and Global Supply Chain771 Words   |  3 PagesGlobal value chain and global supply chain In order to know the tenets of global value chain, it is essential to understand that the value chain is the full range of the involvements that the workers as well as the firm get engaged in, in order to bring an item or goods from their conception to the end user or even beyond that. The activities predominantly looked at here are the designing, production of the goods, the marketing aspect, distribution and the firms support to the customers afterRead MoreSupply Of Supply Chain Management830 Words   |  4 PagesSupply Chain Management Goal of a supply chain. According to Defining the Supply Chain, there are 5 specific goals of supply chain management. They are as follows: 1. Achieve Efficient Fulfillment – â€Å"the purpose of supply chain management is to make inventory readily available in customer facing positions to fulfill demand. The fresh produce business adage â€Å"you can’t sell from an empty wagon† highlights this fundamental purpose of supply chain management†. (Defining the Supply Chain) OrganizationsRead MoreCrocs Case Study Essay1060 Words   |  5 Pagesresult of its unique value chain management system. Foregoing traditional models, Crocs quickly acquired and established a world-wide network of supply, manufacturing, production, and delivery systems. This gave Crocs the ability to minimize costs, maximize efficiency, and deliver the best value to their customers. Within this customer-focused framework, Crocs created a unique global value management system, superior in execution and focus when compared with traditional supply chain systems. TraditionalRead MoreFord Motor Companys Movement1524 Words   |  7 PagesCompany’s movement in a global market is the next frontier in the world of business; its overall objectives are clear and concise. However, the implementation, development, and execution strategy are complicated, consisting of many layers, with the proper performance one can only hope the end result is concise operations, established market share, and profitability. Our company will move forward with a strategy to out preform, produce, and provide a competitive product in global markets. The company

The World’s Greatest Leaders Free Essays

string(43) " must all analyse your own responsibility\." Throughout history, there have been numerous nations that risen and fallen apart in the blink of the eye. There’s one aspect that separates all the nations that have existed through the course of human history: the person that leading the nation at its peak and its worst. Queen Elizabeth 1, Abraham Lincoln, and Mao Zedong are all leaders who have cemented their names in history for their contributions to their countries. We will write a custom essay sample on The World’s Greatest Leaders or any similar topic only for you Order Now Queen Elizabeth 1 become the queen of England (UK) in 1558 and would go on to rule England for 45 until her death in 1603. Her rule is often referred to as the golden age of English history. Despite this, Queen Elizabeth greatly struggled with maintaining peace in England and pursuing their country that she was a great leader. Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president of the United States (US) from 1861 to 1865. He also lead the north in the civil war and reconstruction the south after the war was over, but sadly was assassinated before he was able to follow through his plans. Mao Zedong (Mao Tse-Tung) was the founder of the People’s Republic of China and ruled China for 27 years. He lead China through a civil war to unite the whole country together and create a new government. Even with being blinded by their own perspectives, all three successful governments had leaders who had the ability to unite different people and were cautious when picking their advisors. The Weakness of Each Reign Despite the powerful governments that Queen Elizabeth, President Lincoln, and Chairman Mao built, they all had a weakness that hurt their time in power. When Elizabeth began her reign, she made Protestantism of England but allowed Catholic to practice their religion in private. Some protestant weren’t happy with her decision because of the harsh persecution they had faced during Queen Mary’s reign; They felt that they had to get their revenge and Elizabeth wasn’t going to give to them. So, they turned against her and become to be known as Puritans: protestants but with more extreme views. Puritans would actively try to change the structure of the religion. On April 4 1566, William Strickland went up to parliament with the proposal to reform the prayer book and to change the practices of the clergy. Elizabeth was not pleased because she wanted to be the only one to make all the religious decision and as a way to punish Strickland for his actions, Elizabeth suspended him from parliament. This decision was bad on Elizabeth part because she was silencing Strickland and others puritans who had the same view because they didn’t agree. Even though Strickland would get restrained, he inspired many Puritans to start rebelling against Elizabeth that would lead to death and a mini- war. People like John Greenwood and Henry Barrow and others would be executed for not conforming to Protestant religion which sparked more hatred from the Puritans to Elizabeth. Elizabeth had a hard time looking at another perspective which created conflict because when anyone wanted to make changes to her ideas, she thought that they were already perfect and the changes weren’t needed. Another thing was that she took the recommendation for changes personality when it wasn’t. Queen Elizabeth inability to view made weakened her ability to rule without bias in her decisions. Abraham Lincoln was an intelligent man but a war wasn’t his area of expertise. So when the civil war started, President Lincoln relied heavily on his army generals to lead the war but his decision of army general almost cost him the war. George B. McClellan was a great general when it came to † drilling troops and inspiring them with loyalty and trust†, but he was â€Å"low, overcautious, duped by his spies’ fantastic exaggerations of enemy strength† and would rather â€Å"to win the war by strategy, not butchery†. McClellan’s overcautious caused his popularity to drop because he appeared to be doing nothing with the men and when he did fight, he lost the battles but wouldn’t take responsibility for the loss. All the people wanted him gone even Lincoln who was very indecisiveness when it to General McClellan. Lincoln allowed him to lead the army despite the damage he was causing for the north; The president reasoning for not replacing him was the general’s popularity with the military men and that if McClellan was gone then many men would abandon their cause for fighting too. This time period created a negative image for Lincoln as the people realized that he wasn’t the strong leader that they needed in the time of war and caused many people’s support for the war to decrease. In 1958, Mao Zedong started the Great Leap Forward program which was meant to start allowing China to progress and catch up to the same progress as developed nations. The idea for the program was that people would be group together and share everything from food, clothing, farming supplies, and homes. In theory, Mao’s ideas should have worked perfectly because everyone would be sharing their resources, but humans are greedy. Many officers who were in charge of the communities started to take extra food from the communities combined with terrible weather lead to negative consequences. 36 million people were reported to die during the Great Leap program due to starvation and direct killing. The famine would lead to cannibalism, people abandoning their families, and civil unrest in the country. Officers were often violent to citizens who were caught trying to take food by torturing and beating citizens. Instead of taking responsibility for his actions and policies and the effect it had on the Chinese people, Mao Zedong just attempted to cover up by blaming his party members. â€Å"As for talking of responsibility, [other CCP leaders] have some responsibility – but the one with the most responsibility is me†¦ The chaos caused was on a grand scale and I take responsibility. Comrades, you must all analyse your own responsibility. You read "The World’s Greatest Leaders" in category "Papers" If you have to shit, then shit. If you have to fart, then fart. You will feel better for it.† Mao isn’t willing to allow himself to take responsibility for his faults but trying to share it on the other members so that his reputation isn’t tainted. None of the three leaders are perfect and all have faults that negatively impacted the citizens of their countries. All three were blinded by the perspectives because they thought that their methods were the best which created problems. Elizabeth wasn’t able to see things from the puritans perspective, Mao wouldn’t take responsibility for the famine that killed million due to his policies, and Lincoln was afraid to dismiss McClellan even when he was hurting the North’s war effort. At the end of the day, all 3 leaders were just humans who have faults but still managed to unite the different people during times of trial. Ability to Unite People Having to unite room of people and having them agree on one decision is something most people would dread to do. Yet, the three leaders were able to unite nations when the countries were at their lowest points. When Queen Elizabeth started her reign, she had to solve the issue of what to do with religion in England. When her half-brother had been king England was protestant but when her half-sister took over, Catholicism became the religion of the country creating a civil war between the two religious groups. Elizabeth had the difficult task of unifying the two fighting groups with a settlement that would please everyone so that England wouldn’t fall into a civil war; Also, she had to be aware of Spain and France who were Catholic countries and didn’t want the two countries to attack England. As a solution, Queen Elizabeth created the Elizabethan Settlement which tried to be the middle ground between the two religion by incorporating two aspects of both religions. The Act of Supremacy made Elizabeth the â€Å"supreme governor of this realm† which made her in charge of the Catholic people instead of the pope; Another aspect was that clergy had to â€Å"make, take, and receive a corporal oath upon the evangelist† pleading their allegiance to the Queen. This ensured that Elizabeth was able to make religious decisions over the whole country and everyone would obey her orders. Catholic would be executed if they were found conspiring with the pope because they had pledged their alliance to Elizabeth. The Act of Uniformity was the most important because it put all the prayer books into a common one where everyone could use and wrote it in vague language so that both Protestant and Catholics would be pleased. It also required that everyone attend church or they would pay 12 dollars for each time they missed. This act would unite all of England even if forced while other parts of Europe were engaged in religious war. In spite of the many challenges that she had to overcome, Elizabeth was able to unite the Protestants and Catholics and evade a war. President Lincoln entered the presidency when the united states was in a tense state with the US beginning divided between the slave south and the free north. Lincoln tried his hardest to perverse the union but when South Carolina seceded from the union, other states followed the pattern. When the war began, the north struggled with military strategies and not all the states in the north were in support of Lincoln actions. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation which had many benefits for the north. † Now, therefore I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States †¦order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States, are, and henceforward shall be free† .The emancipation proclamation made slavery illegal in the states that had seceded from the union which made the north happy because they had started the war for this reason. Something important to recognize is that Lincoln only made slavery illegal in states that had seceded so that states that were in the union and had slaves wouldn’t get angry and feel offended. The northern states now had a common goal that united them together of deafening the south and freeing any slaves being held. The slaves begin free was an advantage because the north had more men to unite the war and slaves in the south would start fighting the south giving Lincoln more time. Mao Zedong came into power with communist party of China when China was fighting the war against Japan who was dominating all of west Asia and had it’s sight set on China. Mao Zedong realized how important it was that China is united or get conquered. † The Chinese people now find themselves in the following situation: the Japanese aggressors have not yet been defeated; the Chinese people urgently need to work together for a democratic change in order to achieve national unity, rapidly mobilize and unite all anti-Japanese forces, and defeat the Japanese aggressors in co-operation with the allies† stated Mao in political report. Mao along with his party was able to unite a scattered Chinese population to fight against Japan and won. Mao known that united China would be a threat to the world and would only make China stronger, so he counted to advocate for unity from the Chinese people. After the war with Japan, then communist and nationalists started a civil war over who would control China. Under Mao’s leadership, the communist party was able to defeat the nationalist party. 10 years later, Mao stated † It was only after the Communist Party led the people in waging a long and arduous struggle that they were able to change to being united from being like loose sand, a condition which favoured the reactionaries’ exploitation and oppression, and that the people achieved this great unity among themselves within a few years after victory in the revolution†. Due to Mao’s persistent fighting for a unified China was the country able to defeat Japan and became a strong nation. How to cite The World’s Greatest Leaders, Papers

The Bullard Houses free essay sample

â€Å"The Bullard Houses† is a case in which Downtown, a corporation formed by James Bullard’s descendants, is seeking for a buyer for the site that has been saved by Downtown from destruction. The reason behind this potential deal is because Downtown is in a great cash shortage. There are two parties current interested in this site, including Absentia, the client I as a senior partner in Jones Jones represent for. The resulting negotiation between the representative of Downtown and me covers a couple of issues, such as primarily the price of the Bullard Houses and the use of it, etc. Yan Ma, the representative of Downtown, started off by raising Downtown’s concerns about the future use of the Bullard Houses. Instead of mentioning about their current financial situation, Yan repeatedly questioned me about the purpose for which Absentia was going to acquire the site. From my prospective, I didn’t have the authority to reveal to anyone the real purpose, which is to building a high-rise hotel in the garden area. We will write a custom essay sample on The Bullard Houses or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Hence, I made much effort in an attempt to get around this question.Nevertheless, she mentioned that the only way she could continue this negotiation was to know the intended use of the site because her clients bought the property in the hope that their ancestors’ heritage can be protected from being destroyed. With no rout of retreat, I chose to reveal that Milton Hotel Group wishes to build a hotel but to keep the exterior appearance as it was at the moment. Yan surprisingly seemed not opposed with Milton’s projection. Frankly speaking, I did not quite understand why she agreed to move on to the next issue after hearing a high-rise hotel will be built and the interior of the Bullard House will be redesigned as the lobby of the hotel. With this big issue being solved, we soon reached a final deal of a total price of $18. 5 million in which $13 million would be paid up front and the remaining $5. 5 million would be paid by installment within one and a half years. On top of that, the option for Downtown to buy at least one unit in the Bullard Houses was offered and thus we sealed the deal.As I review the whole negotiation process now, I admit I was in a very passive position at the beginning. By passive, I mean I could not react to Yan’s questions for the planned use of the site in a way I should have. She pointed out a few problems that her clients do not want to see after the Bullard Houses site was handed over. For instance, she mentioned that James Bullard’s descendents felt like the taste of the building, regardless of whether the exterior or the interior, being remained as it was at the moment, and in addition, they were opposed to high-rise non-residential use of the site.I, afterwards, interpreted all these questions as her additional chips in hand for the later discussion about the price since she could raise the price for that I admitted my client couldn’t meet one or two of their requests. As I mentioned earlier, I had no choice but to disclose the intended use of the site in order to keep the negotiation moving on. After knowing my client’s plan, her previous standpoint against high-rise non-residential use of the site diminished somehow.I was aware of the change in her reaction instantly, which inspired me to think she might have betrayed her clie nt’s interest of keeping the building style unchanged and not allowing non-residential use of the site as well such that she could continue the negotiation and hopefully seal the deal. On the issue of the price, I made the first offer of $17 million that was well below my reservation price. Along with the offer, I stated my own opinion towards the current financial situation of Downtown just to reemphasize how crucial cash was for them.As it was mentioned in the case, I have the authority to offer a maximum of $24 million for the property. I automatically assumed it could all be cash payment. With the help of this big advantage, what Yan mentioned about the other party’s willing to offer $20 million within which we both knew cash payment wouldn’t by any chance exceed our offer was no longer charming. The final price was settled at $18. 5 million after a series of concessions were asked and given by both parties.In conclusion, the outcome was very favorable from my perspective since we needed to pay way less than the price we expected for the most desirable site we had been looking for. As I review it now, this is a distributive negotiation with one primary issue that both parties want to get the best deal on. However, I had an advantage of the availability of cash, which again is what my opponent was lacking of. Hence, the only strategy I adopted in the negotiation was simply to find my opponent’s weakness and to act aggressively on the issue associated with the weakness.After continuously attacking their weakness with my advantage in payment methods as well as giving some concessions, I successfully created an illusion that the price and options I offered was approaching my reservation price such that her further effort of pushing the price even high could eventually make me walk away. This was something she did not want to see from her own perspective as, I will discuss later in detail, that she already put her client’s interest second and her goal was to get the deal. Of necessity, this simple strategy worked out well.The key to this strategy is a lways to match my opponent’s needs with my advantages. As far as I’m concerned, two factors actually have had a big impact on the process of the negotiation. One factor is my leak of the intended use of the Bullard Houses site. The other one is her personal acceptance of my client’s projection for the property. The negotiation should have been interrupted, which did not happen, because of any of these two events. Both of Yan and me have made essential mistakes to more or less satisfy our own interests rather than our client’s.On one hand, I should’ve stated â€Å"sorry, I cannot reveal the planned use of the property for competitive purposes† or called it off when I confronted with Yan’s questions. On the other hand, Yan should have rejected my client’s proposal without any thinking because we all knew that even if I promised you not to change the exterior or interior of the Bullard Houses, the style of the hotel would not be exactly as promised. The message I get from these two mistakes we made is that sometimes no deal is a good deal when you and your client’s interests are not aligned.Moreover, an agent has the responsibility to confirm instructions or call it off when he or she has to violate their instructions. As a principal, he or she needs to confirm their priorities or call it off when the best offer violates their core objective. All in all, I learned a lot from this negotiation experience because both of my opponent and myself made mistakes. I now understand that being honest doesn’t mean I have to violate my client’s instructions. More importantly, agents’ own interest should never be above their client’s. These two rules apply to any kind of negotiation.